The Big Lebowski

This film is one of my all time favorites; I can’t decide if it’s because of all the quotable one-liners, from, “You’re out of your element Donny!” to “Where’s the money Lebowski!” to “Get a job sir!” (The bums lost) I think that the article in Film Monthly was pretty accurate about this film being about the struggle between generations, because you could easily see the contempt shown to “The Dude” by Lebowski Sr. and Jackie Treehorn. This was kind of ironic because neither of Lebowski Sr. or Jackie Treehorn were doing anything even close to ethical, yet they looked down upon “The Dude” as if he was scum. Just because he was a non-conformist, pacifist, hippy, they thought he was below them, even though morally and ethically he was way beyond them. He did not have a thirst for power or money; he only wanted to peacefully co-exist with his fellow bowlers.

The euphemism of bowling with life was also apparent throughout the movie, because they kept coming back to it as the one constant in “The Dude’s” life. It was the one thing that was stabilizing his and Walter’s life, and tying them together. That was another ironic part of the story, that either one of them would be hanging out together. In 98% of cases, they would be enemies simply based on their beliefs and personalities, but bowling brought them together to peacefully co-exist (as long as no one stepped over the line) That is one of my favorite parts of the movie, when Smokie steps over the line, and Walter insists that it’s a fault. This is while he’s talking to “The Dude” about how he should get a new rug from Lebowski Sr. because he owes him, and also because “it ties the room together.”

The Hudsucker Proxy

This was a very interesting film, because the dialogue was so entertaining and unique, which is a motif that I have seen in almost every Coen brothers movie. It was basically a satire directed at the movie industry, because it was just so obnoxious and funny that the contempt for the movie industry was obvious. Tim Robbins was excellent in his role as the “pawn” with “no experience,” because his over acting and excitement throughout the film makes his role as the supposed idiot more believable.

When comparing this movie to some of the other Coen brother films, I did not see any concessions made by them, it seemed actually a little bit more absurd than most of their other films. “The Big Lebowski” and “Fargo” where pretty quirky themselves, their storyline was a little more straight forward and believable. “The Hudsucker Proxy” seemed like a tongue-in-cheek joke right from the beginning. Things such as the newspaper ad that listed “long hours and low pay” along with when the old man jumped out of the window to his doom, and one of the board members remarked that “he at least could have opened a window” made you immediately recognize that this movie was not to be taken seriously.

One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest

The film "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" received many awards for its authenticity, mainly because the Director and Producer of this film decided to make the extra effort and sit in on group therapy sessions in mental institutions. They probably did this to get a good feel for how things work, the procedures that the staff did throughout each patient’s treatment, and how people acted during their group therapy sessions. This was essential for the filmmakers because it allowed them to know when they were getting the best, most realistic performance out of each actor. They would not be able to do that without seeing people in those real life situations.

Jack Nicholson did deserve the awards he received for playing the role of McMurphy, because he was not only believable in his performance, but he was also able to remain likeable to the audience while he did everything in his power to piss people off. Some people are just like that, they like to prod and poke at people to not only irritate them, but to see if they can push them over the edge and make them flip out. Jack Nicholson did this beautifully, while also being able to make people empathize with his situation, even though he brought it on himself.

Louise Fletcher was also brilliant in her role as Nurse Ratched, because she was able to convey the cold, unfeeling nature of her job, while also not allowing people to empathize with her at all. She made her part in the movie seem very believable, which makes you wonder if she is really like that in real life. The end where she tears into one of the patients, making fun of him, and telling him she was going to call his mom, was very intense, because it was the first time that you were able to see her human side. The rest of the time was spent waiting for her to crack, so when it did finally happen, that just made it that much more satisfying, because you were finally able to see that she was indeed a real, feeling person, not just an uncaring, unfeeling robot.

Rio Bravo

Rio Bravo was not the typical Western, even though it had many of the typical aspects. The main difference was that John Wayne's character was not a loner, or a drifter. He was the sheriff of a small town. He did have some trusty sidekicks, who were loyal but not necessarily the best people he could have around to help him. There was the typical battle of Good vs. Evil, which is the focus of the story.

"Rio Bravo" also featured the girl in distress, which was typical of the westerns filmed in this era. In this film she was a little different because she was a strong woman with ambition. She didn't necessarily need any help from a man, but she welcomed the company and support of John Wayne because she was attracted to him.

This particular film was also a little different because it featured the super star power of John Wayne, along with rising stars such as Dean Martin. The film reminded me of another classic Western, "High Noon," because it was a similar story of a Sheriff protecting a town in distress from the Evil outlaws, which is a typical Western motif.

Mon Oncle

This film was very reminiscent of the film by Mr Brainwash. It had ADD and indecisiveness written all over it. It was much better because it was not random shots placed together, it was just obvious that the director could not make up his mind on what shots to keep and what shots to cut, so he just left everything in. I understand what he was trying to do, and in some cases, it was effective. I think that by using this style throughout the movie, he just frustrated me because it was not a fluid style of editing, it was way too choppy and distracting. The director must have had total creative control, because most editors would not have allowed this to happen.

I agree with the director that you should get as many shots as possible from as many different angles as possible (as appropriate) but you need to make the critical decisions on what to keep and what to cut, so it appears smooth and pleasing to the eye, and also complements and enhances the story that you are trying to tell. After all, the whole point of making a film is to tell a story or share your idea with the world. If it's not clear and concise, or hard to watch, it will not be effective.